Lancaster's $5B data center expansion faces backlash over generator noise near homes
Plans for the second phase of a major data centre on Greenfield Road in Lancaster have sparked concerns over noise levels. The project, set to transform the former LSC Communications printing plant, would create a two-storey, 735,128-square-foot facility costing around $5 billion. Both residents and planning commission members have raised questions about the impact of backup generators and electrical infrastructure on nearby homes and parks.
The site at 216 Greenfield Road has stood empty since the printing plant closed around 2020. Developers, including Chirisa Technology Parks and Machine Investment Group, now plan to lease the space to CoreWeave, an artificial intelligence and cloud computing firm. The project's lifespan is estimated at 25 to 30 years, with the facility positioned between Route 30 and the first phase of the data centre.
Noise has become the central issue for both the Planning Commission and local residents. Under the community benefits agreement, noise from the centre must not exceed current levels for neighbouring homes and Conestoga Pines Park. Residents Linda and Roger Stoner highlighted worries about the electric substation being built on the west side of the property, closest to their homes.
The second phase initially proposed 104 diesel backup generators but has since reduced the number to 84. Each generator will undergo monthly testing, typically for an hour, with only four running simultaneously to comply with noise restrictions. Commission members questioned why generators were necessary rather than addressing power outages through other means.
The project will return to the board for preliminary and final approval, though no date has been confirmed yet.
The data centre's development hinges on addressing noise concerns from both officials and the community. With testing protocols in place and a reduced number of generators, developers aim to meet the agreed noise limits. The next steps will depend on further reviews by the Planning Commission.
