Skip to content

A call for a nationwide discussion on rational drone regulations is necessary

Delve into the discourse on Reasonable Regulations for Drones, as discussed in our publication. Uncover thought-provoking perspectives, thorough examination, and historical background through unique, captivating articles.

Discussing Necessary National Regulations for Practical Drone Operations
Discussing Necessary National Regulations for Practical Drone Operations

A call for a nationwide discussion on rational drone regulations is necessary

Matthew McIntosh, an administrator, provides insights into the current state and future direction of drone regulation in the United States.

Recent enforcement actions by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are raising concerns about tightening restrictions on drone flights. A bill under discussion in Congress aims to reauthorize federal spending on the FAA and could set the stage for the widespread use of unmanned aircraft systems (drones) at very low altitudes across the United States.

The bill, if passed, would allow university drones to support cutting-edge research in various fields such as aeronautical engineering, archaeology, and agriculture. However, it would also prevent academics from using drones to "survey, create a nuisance on, or overfly private property without the permission of the owner of the private property." This bill is a good first step, but a broader national discussion is needed about how commercial and recreational drones should operate near the ground, focusing on maintaining a sensible balance between federal, state, and local control and respecting landowners.

The lowermost airspace, just above homes, is being viewed by the aviation industry as the next frontier in commercial aviation, a "public highway" for a multi-billion-dollar industry. SkyWard, a company building traffic management systems for unmanned aircraft, proclaims that "The airspace is a great place to build a new highway."

Robotics innovator Helen Greiner told The Guardian that drones could fly in an "unobstructed highway" not far above the trees and power lines, making mobility easier. However, the FAA has recently started asserting that private landowners do not have jurisdiction over the airspace above their property and cannot prohibit or allow aviation operations over their land at any altitude.

Key recent developments include the Protecting America’s Airspace from Unauthorized Drone Activity Act, which aims to codify President Trump’s Executive Order on Restoring American Airspace Sovereignty. This legislation targets unauthorized drone activities over military bases, critical infrastructure, and other sensitive sites to enhance national security.

The FAA’s Proposed Part 108 Rule on Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) Operations would modernize U.S. drone regulations by enabling more extensive commercial operations beyond the pilot’s visual line of sight without requiring individual waivers. This rule is expected to significantly boost innovation and commercial uses such as agriculture, package delivery, surveying, and manufacturing.

While the federal government is expanding drone integration into national airspace, there remain critical concerns around privacy and property rights. The FAA’s rules impose operational restrictions to mitigate risks to public safety, but the rapid expansion of BVLOS and other uses might raise new privacy and surveillance concerns for individuals and communities.

Innovation and Industry Impact: Alongside domestic regulation, Congress is moving to fast-track military drone production and exports to allies via the LEAD Act, which updates export laws to treat drones more like aircraft than missiles. This is intended to boost the domestic drone manufacturing sector and strengthen U.S. leadership globally, indirectly supporting innovation and industrial growth within the drone ecosystem.

Overall, the U.S. is moving toward a more permissive but controlled environment for low-altitude drone operations, emphasizing national security and innovation while maintaining certain operational restrictions to safeguard the public. However, gaps remain regarding clear federal privacy and property protections, leaving these issues largely to state/local authorities and raising ongoing debate about the balance between local control and federal airspace sovereignty.

References: [1] Protecting America’s Airspace from Unauthorized Drone Activity Act (introduced July 2025) [2] FAA’s Proposed Part 108 Rule on Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) Operations (proposed August 2025) [3] [4] Additional resources on FAA’s Proposed Part 108 Rule can be found at FAA's website and FAA's BVLOS rulemaking docket [5] LEAD Act (introduced March 2023)

  1. As the FAA's Proposed Part 108 Rule on Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) Operations aims to modernize drone regulations, it could spur innovation in various fields such as data-and-cloud-computing and technology.
  2. The lowermost airspace, often seen as a home-and-garden for many, is becoming a potential battleground for policy-and-legislation and politics, with debates surrounding privacy, property rights, and federal regulations.
  3. Despite the ongoing concerns about privacy and property rights, the general-news shows a positive outlook for the drone industry, with the U.S. leaning towards a more permissive yet controlled environment, fostering growth in sectors like home-and-garden, lifestyle, and general-news.

Read also:

    Latest